nightspore
Group: Members
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mar. 2008 |
|
Posted: Nov. 05 2010, 20:26 |
|
Quote (Ugo @ Nov. 05 2010, 19:35) | @ nightspore: Prætorius didn't write this, the YouTube tag is wrong. He wrote "In Dulci Jubilo", whose original version (if you want, I may upload it somewhere) is, of course, much slower than Mike's cover. "Cuckoo Song" is a traditional tune from the 1500s. Regarding this 45-to-33 experiment, to me it's no more curious than "The Chipmunk Song" slowed down, which shows very clearly that David Seville (a.k.a. Ross Bagdasarian) was doing all of the three Chipmunk voices as well, of course, as his own (there are better versions of this clip on YouTube, where the "David" character sounds normal as well). Hearing the same thing on "Cuckoo Song" almost makes you think for an instant that this is the way in which the song was originally recorded - of course, except for the fact that, as we all know, Les Penning and Mike are so good that they could very well play the song at its original speed without any need of such "tricks". Also, the bell tree (the Christmas-ish percussion) sounds very strange here. |
I don't know about the Youtube tag, Ugo - I'm going from my LP, which contains a suite of six dances by Pretorius. One of the dances became the Cuckoo song. It's possible that Praetorius reworked an earlier dance, but the LP says merely that the dances are "a tiny fragment of the works of the son of a Thuringian pastor". The suite is dated 1612.
|