smillsoid
Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Dec. 2008 |
|
Posted: April 10 2009, 14:49 |
|
Quote (Holger @ Aug. 01 2008, 14:51) | Quote (nightspore @ July 24 2008, 02:45) | Surprisingly, though, I know of no classical music that does this. The reason is that "melody", in the sense of pleasant, catchy tunes, is largely considered passé in serious music these days; listen, for example, to Black Angels, by Pulitzer Prize winning composer George Crumb; it's like Amarok without the melody (although it's quite effective in its way). So if you want melodic serious music you have to go back almost 100 years (except in the case of Russian music, where the Communist Party forbade composers such as Shostakovich to write discordantly). Actually, Shostakovich is probably the closest you'll get to serious music that combines both music and noise. Listen to his Violin Concerto Op. 99 or his 10th Symphony. |
In terms of classical / "serious" music, I find Bartók (e.g. Violin Concerto No. 2, Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta) and Messiaen (e.g. Turangalîla Symphony) to have a nice balance between "music and noise", as you put it; I guess Stravinsky would also qualify, but personally I've never really been able to get into his music. |
Anyone unfamiliar with the title of this brilliant bit of Bartok, should think "Jack Torrance looking down on the model/real maze in 'The Shining'". Yes, bits of Amarok are definitely Bartokian.
-------------- http://www.reverbnation.com/simonjmills
|