Holger
Group: Members
Posts: 1506
Joined: Feb. 2003 |
|
Posted: April 04 2003, 03:39 |
|
I'm listening to Tubular Bells right now, for the first time in ages, and I think that now I've finally realized why I find this album so odd. What I used to think about it is that it is 'very good for a debut album but inferior to his later (epic) works'. But now I feel that it isn't really inferior, it's just very very different. This is of course the same Mike who did the later albums, but somehow it has a really different feel to it, a kind of 'bathroom' feeling if you know what I mean, whereas Hergest Ridge, Ommadawn, and Incantations give me that large outdoors feeling, all sloping landscapes, enchanting woods, and clear blue skies if you know what I mean. Only after Incantations did he return to making 'bathroom' albums - Platinum is a prime example, but it goes for QE2, Five Miles Out, Crises etc. as well. I think he himself said that thing about the bathroom, about how he tried to build a studio that's like a big bathroom for Platinum. Now don't take this bathroom thing too seriously, I'm just using this word to describe in what way I feel TB to be different from his later 'epic' works. The later ones are like real symphonies in a more or less classical sense, while TB is 'just' some weird guy experimenting around with different styles and techniques and patching it all together to make a 'big' work. Not that that is exactly a bad thing, no really. But I get a feeling that if, purely hypothetically, he'd made Platinum right after TB and left out Hergest Ridge, Ommadawn, and Incantations, my perception of his work would be very, very different. He'd still be one of my favourites for sure, but I'm not entirely sure if he would have made the same, almost immeasurable (sorry if this sounds pathetic) impact on my life that he did as it is. So what do you think of this? Am I just talking rubbish, or is there something to it?
|