Moz
Group: Musicians
Posts: 600
Joined: July 2005 |
 |
Posted: Nov. 05 2006, 20:51 |
 |
Leafy,
And I think that the system of workin the service will set it apart from other. Levels of users will make communication better.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
There's a lot of registered users, but what the hell it means when not even a hundred of them stay active on forum and write posts?
Are you talking about tubular.net? This is a Mike Oldfield community, and it goes quiet when Mike Oldfield news is thin on the ground. Few communities have a lot of active users, and most have far more members than people who actually post. Don't forget the number of members includes people who have left, and spammers!
You're the father of Tubular? I know that you will defence your project, but you won't give the producers so many possibilities.
How does lyricless.com not help the producers? It gives people a place to put their music. I'm building an A-Z of artists to make it easier to find music by specific people. You can register and post your own links or wait for DC to do it for you (and if you link, he'll upload the file to his web space). You've already registered and posted a track, and you've got 1 comment so far. People have already started advertising the site - a while ago, I did a search and found a few posts on other forums where people advertised lyricless.com at non Mike Oldfield forums. And as I said, we get over 1,000 unique visitors a month at the moment. I don't know how many of those people come from tubular.net, but either way it's a lot of people for a fairly new site.
But my idea is to create new BIG and ACTIVE society of PRODUCERS! Don't follow me - don't go anywhere, just do the new project HERE!
No site is big from the beginning. I have watched lyricless.com go from 0 to 1000 visitors in 6 months. That's a good start. The point was NOT to go for the biggest site possible, it was simply to make a good site. If it's good, it will get big naturally. Setting out to make a big site is something that everyone wants to do, but as Wayfarer said, can you afford it?
And when you say "just do the new project here" - if you hadn't noticed, we cannot host music files at tubular.net, so how could we possibly do anything like lyricless.com here? Also, the forum layout doesn't make it easy to find things by anything other than by date (with the recent stuff at the top). It just doesn't work.
You can think of a new project as a extension of TB Fan tracks but under another domain
which is EXACTLY what lyricless.com is.
I just think about people, who make very good music, but they can't promote theirselves.
Instead of setting up another site, why not tell people about lyricless.com? People already do this. If more people tell their friends and get people to access their music via lyricless.com, then more people will visit! If you want to go it alone we can't stop you, but why not use a site that already exists and help to get more people using it?
--------------
Twitter: @benbarden
|
