algenicus002
Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: Aug. 2005 |
|
Posted: Aug. 10 2005, 06:57 |
|
According to Apple (check out this link: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106882), "copy protected discs" are NOT CDs and are incompatible with Macs. Philips shares the same view, too.
It seems like a conspiracy to put the LEGITIMATE buyers in a no-win situation.
1. The recording company gets the money from the sucker who bought the disc. 2. Macrovision and Sunncomm (the parasite mafia gangs who develop the "copy protection" systems) get their percentage from the increased price of the disc. 3. The sucker (aka buyer) finds out he can't play the disc in his CD/DVD player or car CD player. 4. The sucker either goes out to buy a more expensive (even if better-sounding) version (SACD, DVD-A) or buys a blank CD-R (and the recording company does get some more money out of this purchase, because there IS a tax on blank recording and data storage media that goes to RIAA and IFPI) to copy the disc so he can listen to it. 5. In the US, circumventing the lock is a criminal offense. Thus, the LEGITIMATE buyer is a criminal. Add the unauthorized copying of the recorded work and blah blah blah... At least, in Europe, we HAVE the right (under European law, and much to IFPI's chagrin) to copy the works we've bought.
Mike's dismissive and insulting response to the whole debacle was a great faux pas on his side.
And no, the "copy protection" doesn't do a single thing to prevent anyone from copying the recorded work.
|