hiawatha
Group: Members
Posts: 2391
Joined: Mar. 2004 |
|
Posted: Mar. 19 2006, 04:09 |
|
Quote (Korgscrew @ Mar. 18 2006, 18:11) | That rather depends on your definition of white. Take a novel printed on white paper and hold it up next to a monitor displaying white. The book is likely to suddenly appear rather less white, depending on the ambient lighting and the exact nature of the book (novels tend to be printed on paper that's closer to a cream colour, glossy coffee table books are usually a purer white).
I actually find the stark, bright white from a computer monitor very tiring to look at after a while, so I welcome colour schemes that soften that. I think there's actually something to be said for white on black for certain applications (it's actually a very common standard for display screens - indicator boards at stations and airports are often white on black, as is teletext, and computer screens were green or white on black for a long time).
I have no problems with the current black on blue scheme - if you want black on white, there's no reason you can't create a skin for it.
I don't think we need set any rules for colours in skins. If we find that a particular submitted skin is impossible to look at for one reason or another, we'll alter it or ask the creator to modify it. They'll be entirely optional anyway. |
Thanks for the explanation. I didn't mean to denigrate the current colour scheme of this site. Black on very pale blue is close enough to black-on-white. As for the white-on-black sites, many of those that I've seen use some sort of narrow font so the letters end up looking dark grey on the black background. That's when you have to hilight in order to read the site. High contrast is the most important thing.
I also was not sure that the skins would be optional.
-------------- "In the land of the Dacotahs, Where the Falls of Minnehaha Flash and gleam among the oak-trees, Laugh and leap into the valley." - Song of Hiawatha
|