Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

Pages: (3) < [1] 2 3 >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Topic: Do we have the right..< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
Guest
Unregistered





Posted: June 01 2008, 18:24

To ask for more from Mike Oldfield?

He now and then speaks about retirement - personally I don´t think he gonna, because he IS the music - but do we really have the right to ask for more from an artist who has given us so much?

He has produced many albums and many in very different styles...classic, new age, rock, reggae, instrumental, with a frontsinger and even a full chorus and orchestra  - you name it, he has done the most.
Even though some complains, he has actually made many tours and public appearances over the years.
In fact he has done more than some of the very best-selling artists/groups..so why can´t we have enough?..

Are we fanatic fans or is it Mike Oldfield´s own fault, that he makes "crack" music....we get addicted and are constant coming back for more?   :)
Back to top
Bassman Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Feb. 2008
Posted: June 01 2008, 22:10

I think the danger is when the more fervent fans start to "demand", rather than "ask".  It's perfectly human to want more of whatever intoxicates you.  It's such a delicate line to tread.  Music has become such a cross-pollinated commodity that it's no wonder the discerning listener has become so hungry for quality.  Having said that, many feel that being a fulltime musician is a job-just like a plumber, a painter, or even a footballer.  So we want a person who's really good at their job to continue doing their job.  I've spoken very pointedly on other threads about exactly this aspect of MO's career.  For myself, I wished very much over the years that he had been persuaded by his camp to include my town in his tour itineraries.  But I guess that ship has sailed.  Sooner or later every one feels the pull of domesticity and this may be his time.  And that's perfectly human too.  But-damn!, losing him to retirement would be a tough pill to swallow.

:/
Back to top
Profile PM 
Sweetpea Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 1476
Joined: April 2007
Posted: June 01 2008, 22:47

Quote (prisoner.of.the.dark.sky @ June 01 2008, 18:24)
Do we have the right.. To ask for more from Mike Oldfield?

I look at it this way: there's a difference between desiring, asking, and demanding.

1) I don't feel I have a right to demand anything from Mike Oldfield. My status as 'fan' grants no special privilege other than a sense of superiority for having excellent musical taste.

2) I have no issue with asking, unless it's the persistent kind that is akin to the buzzing of flies over a downed wildebeest struggling to reach the waterhole.

3) I have every right to desires, and I've sometimes shared them... such as my too-much-time-on-my-hands outline for a four-movement 'Taurus IV' symphony, recklessly cannibalising the first three "Taurus"es, while tacking on a superfluous matadorian (Olé! ) bonus track. Such fancies are indulged with no expectation of realization, but they run the risk of irking others for wasting boardspace.

Quote
do we really have the right to ask for more from an artist who has given us so much?

I'm guessing that many fans don't really expect their requests to be met - they just want to vent, hear what others think, or show their appreciation by expressing a desire for more.

Quote
Are we fanatic fans or is it Mike Oldfield´s own fault, that he makes "crack" music....we get addicted and are constant coming back for more?

I think... yes, and yes.  :D


--------------
"I'm no physicist, but technically couldn't Mike both be with the horse and be flying through space at the same time? (On account of the earth's orbit around the Sun and all that). So it seems he never had to make the choice after all. I bet he's kicking himself now." - clotty
Back to top
Profile PM 
Gladstoner Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: May 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 01:24

Quote (Sweetpea @ June 01 2008, 21:47)
I look at it this way: there's a difference between desiring, asking, and demanding. .....

I was going to respond, but you pretty much covered everything....   :D

Well, I should add that Mike, being the creative wellspring that he is, will most likely continue to make Music. The question is whether or not he'll go to the trouble to record it and release it to the public.


--------------
You don't find great music. It finds you.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Scatterplot Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 1981
Joined: Dec. 2007
Posted: June 02 2008, 01:45

I don't think any of the above really enters into it. The guy's going to do or not do as he sees fit. I'm not counting on it. It's just the feeling I get from all the interviews I saw. He seems burned out, tired. He was one of those guys who kept looking young for so long, now he shows his age, but more than that......a desire to get away from it all, perhaps forever. I remember my brother(same age as MO), was so jealous of the photos of this mid forties guy on the Voyager CD. Looked like he was about 28. Anyway his body of work is a lot larger than a lot of other bands/solo acts, now long gone. Me, I've been running out of heroes for a long time. MO was the last since he was younger than most of them. It was fun all those decades going to the record stores and heading straight to the "O" section in rock. I'd hit the other letters later, O always came first. O definately came first.....
Jim


--------------
We raise our voices in the night
Crying to heaven
And will our voices be heard
Or will they break Like the wind
Back to top
Profile PM 
clotty Offline




Group: Members.
Posts: 237
Joined: Mar. 2006
Posted: June 02 2008, 02:18

Quote
It was fun all those decades going to the record stores and heading straight to the "O" section in rock. I'd hit the other letters later, O always came first. O definately came first.....


Even when there's nothing new to buy and I know that there is going to be nothing there that I don't alreadyhave, I still can't get out of that habit. I have to take a look. (I need therapy).

The music store is the one place where 'O' is the first letter in the alphabet.


--------------
Clotty
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
Tayniee Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 132
Joined: April 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 02:53

Quote (Scatterplot @ June 02 2008, 01:45)
He seems burned out, tired.

I had a fleeting feeling that his health might not be good.
He's been a heavy smoker all his life, and although 55 is no age these days, things can go wrong if you're not careful with it.

On the other hand assumimg he is fit and well, putting the tiredness down to the house move and new baby, it occured to me that he might feel that he's got his life back at last. He had a traumatic start in life and spent the much of his time recovering from it. Music got him through. Now he's living it.      

Still I


--------------
As we all know, endings are just beginnings.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Tayniee Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 132
Joined: April 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 03:16

... Still I suspect he will enjoy dabbling with music technology for ever, no need to take it so seriously anymore. Making music seems a lot more fun these days what with Apple Mac etc, I've had a go on that myself.

Whatever he brings out next I for one will like it, hope he has fun making it, and doesn't listen to the grumpier music critiques on this forum.


--------------
As we all know, endings are just beginnings.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Matt Offline




Group: Admins
Posts: 1186
Joined: Nov. 2002
Posted: June 02 2008, 04:04

Sometimes when I hear people talking about what Mike should do next I am reminded of "What do you want from me?" by Pink Floyd. As everybody above has pointed out, Mike has delivered in spades over his career to date. Me, I try and just want him to do whatever he wants and makes him happy. If that means any more music that I get to listen to then I'll also be happy! If not, I'll just have to dust off Hergest Ridge, Amarok etc. etc. etc. again...

--------------
"I say I say I say I say, what's got three bottles and five eyes and no legs and two wheels"
Back to top
Profile PM 
Scatterplot Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 1981
Joined: Dec. 2007
Posted: June 02 2008, 04:06

Nah...we don't need no grumpy music critiques. Jesus I just adore Hergest Ridge. And how about that Five Miles Out? It just doesn't get any better than this...................

--------------
We raise our voices in the night
Crying to heaven
And will our voices be heard
Or will they break Like the wind
Back to top
Profile PM 
Bassman Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Feb. 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 10:40

Good point about dusting off the old albums.  We will always have that.  John Lennon said something to that effect about people lamenting the Fabs' breakup.  There are always the old albums to listen to when people want to feel nostalgic.  MO's recorded canon is remarkable in it's breadth and scope.  What a wonderful legacy to leave behind.

I wouldn't blame him if he no longer wants his work to stand along side of the erosion of pop music that's occuring now.  And by that I mean the way it's cheaply made and marketed.  Neophytes who putz about with a few half-formed musical ideas on factory presets then post it on the net?  That's not music.  That's masturbation.  Music is spending years and years trying to quell the fire in your heart in pursuit of your muse (though to be fair MO has indulged in that technological insularity from time to time, seemingly in pursuit of the trendy dollar).  I would hope that MO is never able to silence his muse.

Good point, too, about his health.  Why couldn't someone close to him have taken him manfully by the arm and say, "Mike, enough with the daft smoking, already.  You have family and friends counting on you to be around."?

Unless, of course, a pint and a pipe WAS his muse.

Grumpy music critiques/critics?  Frustrated musicians, the lot of them.  Dime-a-dozen.  Most of them werent even alive back in the 60's or 70's when one had to really pay his dues.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Tayniee Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 132
Joined: April 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 12:44

Quote (Bassman @ June 02 2008, 10:40)
 Why couldn't someone close to him have taken him manfully by the arm and say, "Mike, enough with the daft smoking, already.  You have family and friends counting on you to be around."?

Yeh, a bit of tough love, 'quit the fags and get that chest clear before you set foot back in that studio !!'    :(

--------------
As we all know, endings are just beginnings.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Tati The Sentinel Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 3360
Joined: Feb. 2002
Posted: June 02 2008, 12:46

Quote (Tayniee @ June 02 2008, 04:53)
He's been a heavy smoker all his life, and although 55 is no age these days, things can go wrong if you're not careful with it.

I do wish he quits smoking...my aunt smoked for 40 years and she stopped smoking 5 years ago.The smoking part really really worries me...hope that Jake and Eugene can help him to stop smoking...

At least Mike swims and tries to keep fit,although I think he has put on some weight from 2006 up to now...nothing that my female side thinks it's too bad,ha ha.

Being Mike Oldfield has been something that have helped him a lot inside but now Michael Gordon Oldfield wanna live the life without all the pressure from the past.

I've been looking for other artists whose music has the same effect like Mike's,some are great musically,but as a person,most of them I don't care...it's not like Mike whose biography really adds something to my personal life.That's priceless.


--------------
"But it's always the outsider, the black sheep, that becomes the blockbuster." - Mike Oldfield, 2014

"I remember feeling that I'd been judged unfairly and that I was going to prove them wrong." - Peter Davison, 2011
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
Sir Mustapha Offline




Group: Musicians
Posts: 2802
Joined: April 2003
Posted: June 02 2008, 15:02

Quote (Bassman @ June 02 2008, 10:40)
I wouldn't blame him if he no longer wants his work to stand along side of the erosion of pop music that's occuring now.  And by that I mean the way it's cheaply made and marketed.  Neophytes who putz about with a few half-formed musical ideas on factory presets then post it on the net?  That's not music.  That's masturbation.  Music is spending years and years trying to quell the fire in your heart in pursuit of your muse (though to be fair MO has indulged in that technological insularity from time to time, seemingly in pursuit of the trendy dollar).

You're not saying that as if that's a new phenomenon, are you? The exact same thing used to happen decades ago; except some kids would plaster a few guitar chords together, throw some cheap rhymes on top and play it around the campfire. It's the same thing. Come to think about it... Some kids do exactly that right now, and they make money with it (*ahem*Simple Plan*ahem*). If the kids are doing the same thing, only with samplers and drum machines instead, I don't see any difference. Besides, if they're putting it on the net themselves, without middlemen, without second intentions, it's their own hobby and if you don't like it, don't listen. The Internet is not the TV; you choose your own program. That's why it's such a wonderful medium for music - it's a lot easier to filter out the trash to collect the treasures. Try doing that on MTV...

--------------
Check out http://ferniecanto.com.br for all my music, including my latest albums: Don't Stay in the City, Making Amends and Builders of Worlds.
Also check my Bandcamp page: http://ferniecanto.bandcamp.com
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
Bassman Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Feb. 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 19:25

MTwho?  Figures...

Crap music is crap music regardless of the era.  And there's a huge difference between solo music recorded because of the circumstances of the music business, and the mostly grot that pollutes the airwaves today.  Real musicians don't consider it a "hobby".  It's life to them.

And I get enormous satisfaction that none of the money that all the poseurs through the ages are making is mine.

:)  :)  :)


--------------
Turn up the music... Hi as Fi can go.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Sir Mustapha Offline




Group: Musicians
Posts: 2802
Joined: April 2003
Posted: June 02 2008, 21:14

Quote (Bassman @ June 02 2008, 19:25)
Crap music is crap music regardless of the era.

Okay, part of the issue is settled.

Quote
And there's a huge difference between solo music recorded because of the circumstances of the music business, and the mostly grot that pollutes the airwaves today.


I'm not sure what you mean with that. Either that statement is not clear enough or I'm not really getting it.

Quote
Real musicians don't consider it a "hobby".  It's life to them.


Guess that rules me out of a "real" musician, then... I just wonder what a "real" musician is, in that case! Does one really only become "real" when he can afford his bread with his music? Is a person's art less noble when the he doesn't think it is the be-all-end-all of everything? Personally, I think it doesn't matter. Good music depends on itself, not on what its composer believes it is.


--------------
Check out http://ferniecanto.com.br for all my music, including my latest albums: Don't Stay in the City, Making Amends and Builders of Worlds.
Also check my Bandcamp page: http://ferniecanto.bandcamp.com
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
nightspore Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mar. 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 21:44

Actually, I can't think of any composer who has genuinely retired, and I challenge anyone to name one! The popular view is that Sibelius and Rossini did (Rossini opened a restaurant!;); but Sibelius was still working on little pieces in his nineties, and Rossini continually (although intermittently) produced important late works, notably the Stabat Mater. I think what happens is that musical ideas or melodies enter composers' minds when they least expect it; they say to themselves "Well, I'd better write this down" - and before you know it a new piece has emerged. I'd be most surprised if this weren't the case with Mike as well.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Bassman Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Feb. 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 22:03

Sir M:  Wrong.  Good music depends on it's appreciation by it's audience.  That's a fact that has actually bitten me in the arse more than once until I pulled my head out of it, because at one time I wanted people to like only music that I considered "good".  What an eye-opener to learn over the years that there is no predicting what will stand the test of time.  If 10 guys like Cocker's "With A Little Help From My Friends" and I don't, that means 10 guys understand something that I don't understand.  Which, incidentally, is not the same thing as saying 10 guys who like Britney Spears is the same sort of thing.  I dare say BS's music is marketed as a fashion accessory... just a bit more of a disposable commodity than the Fabs' music.

And when I said "circumstances of the music business" I assumed it was clear that in 1973, to use that year as an example, you had to work like a dog to get a recording contract or you had a four-leaf clover growing out of your butt.

And lastly... Sir M, I found it ironic that after all the displeasure you express towards certain MO albums, you would say to me, "... if you don't like it, don't listen".  Like I've said before, if you want to debate me personally we can keep it off the board.  Otherwise I am sure we can stick to the topic, oui?
Back to top
Profile PM 
Bassman Offline




Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: Feb. 2008
Posted: June 02 2008, 22:12

By the way, Tati.  I'm very interested to know if and how much your aunt's health improved in the 5 years since she quit smoking.  I certainly hope there were some noticeable changes for the better.  I can imagine the hell one goes through to give it up.  More power to her.

:)
Back to top
Profile PM 
Sir Mustapha Offline




Group: Musicians
Posts: 2802
Joined: April 2003
Posted: June 02 2008, 22:36

Quote (Bassman @ June 02 2008, 22:03)
Sir M:  Wrong.  Good music depends on it's appreciation by it's audience.  That's a fact that has actually bitten me in the arse more than once until I pulled my head out of it, because at one time I wanted people to like only music that I considered "good".  What an eye-opener to learn over the years that there is no predicting what will stand the test of time.  If 10 guys like Cocker's "With A Little Help From My Friends" and I don't, that means 10 guys understand something that I don't understand.  Which, incidentally, is not the same thing as saying 10 guys who like Britney Spears is the same sort of thing.  I dare say BS's music is marketed as a fashion accessory... just a bit more of a disposable commodity than the Fabs' music.

Aren't you contradicting yourself there? You say "good music depends on its appreciation by its audience", but then you promptly discard Britney Spears from the rule? Your paragraph sounded (and I hope I didn't interpret it wrong) like it's stuck between two completely opposite views. If the quality of music is defined by the appreciation it gets from its own audience, then Britney Spears should be excellent, not?

Quote
And when I said "circumstances of the music business" I assumed it was clear that in 1973, to use that year as an example, you had to work like a dog to get a recording contract or you had a four-leaf clover growing out of your butt.


And that only means that some people were luckier than others, and incidentally innumerable excellent musicians went without being noticed, or got little fanfare. Did Nick Drake not work hard enough, for instance? I don't know. But most importantly, I don't think today's generation should get less merit than the ones before it just because it's easier to get heard now than it was then. The Internet catalyses things beyond measure, but what's good will still be good, no matter the medium or the technology. Technology is just a tool; and like Bob the Builder would say, "don't go blaming the toolbox: we need the right tool for the job".

Quote
And lastly... Sir M, I found it ironic that after all the displeasure you express towards certain MO albums, you would say to me, "... if you don't like it, don't listen".


Well, firstly, I had to listen at least once to those records to know whether I'd like them or not. But I insisted on them because Mike Oldfield is an artist I care about. That's the only reason why I gave those records repeated listens. And, again, I only discuss them because I care about the artist in question. I don't care about 50 Cent, so I don't listen to him or discuss him (unless I find a VERY good reason to do so). And the Internet is not forcing me to do so; the radio and the TV a couple of years ago would stuff it down my throat if they could, and the alternatives were microscopic close to what the Internet offers. I gave up the radio and the TV and I'm happy now. Oldfield, though, I still care a lot about, and I'll keep on listening to his stuff until he stops, even if it sucks.

Quote
Like I've said before, if you want to debate me personally we can keep it off the board.  Otherwise I am sure we can stick to the topic, oui?


I don't know, I think the community could be interested in this subject. As for going off-topic, perhaps the moderators can snap it off the thread and put it on a new one. I found myself tangled in this talk and perhaps more people can contribute. I hope they can.


--------------
Check out http://ferniecanto.com.br for all my music, including my latest albums: Don't Stay in the City, Making Amends and Builders of Worlds.
Also check my Bandcamp page: http://ferniecanto.bandcamp.com
Back to top
Profile PM WEB 
53 replies since June 01 2008, 18:24 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this topic :: Email this topic :: Print this topic ]

Pages: (3) < [1] 2 3 >






Forums | Links | Instruments | Discography | Tours | Articles | FAQ | Artwork | Wallpapers
Biography | Gallery | Videos | MIDI / Ringtones | Tabs | Lyrics | Books | Sitemap | Contact

Mike Oldfield Tubular.net
Mike Oldfield Tubular.net