Korgscrew
Group: Super Admins
Posts: 3511
Joined: Dec. 1999 |
|
Posted: April 17 2005, 10:23 |
|
In the early 1970s, Mike obviously had very intense, negative feelings inside him, which he was able to channel creatively and use to drive his music-making, as a way of coping.
I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to see the mental suffering as being a direct path to the music, though. Unless absolutely all the conditions are the same as they were in the 1970s (and they're not - Mike is older, and he's found new ways of coping, and there are of course many other things which have changed), Mike falling into a depressed state is more likely to result in the opposite of what happened then - either he wouldn't come out with any music at all, or he wouldn't have the energy to properly execute the ideas which he did have. That could, at best, lead to albums of work which have grains of good ideas in, but which aren't fully realised, with him not having been able to keep developing the ideas as much as would really have been ideal.
It's a bit like the approach of "I write better after I've had a few drinks". That's a good way to become an alcoholic (unless it's nothing more than a weak lemon drink, of course), but it's not really a terribly good way to assist creativity. There will always come a time when it doesn't work, and things can spiral badly, if that's not handled right (I mean to say, nothing wrong with having a beer or whatever before starting work, if the routine helps, just if it doesn't work, the approach shouldn't be to have another - the creativity can turn on independently of the beer, and if it's not turning on, there's another reason for that happening).
I think what's necessary is that he finds ways of gaining creative energy, and channeling that into his work - hoping it'll simply be turned on by one particular set of conditions is, I feel, not the way to get there.
|