a_r_schulz
Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: Sep. 2001 |
|
Posted: Oct. 08 2004, 18:54 |
|
Having eventually got the album myself, I'd first have to nitpick that it's NOT DVD-Audio, just a plain Video-DVD (though with both DTS and Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtracks) - maybe the high-end (DVD-A/SACD) market is still too small, whereas more and more people have at least small 5.1 DVD home cinema systems. About the recordings - well, I guess it's about my 7th version of 4th Rendez-vous (and the least exciting one), and the 3rd..5th of most of the other classic tracks, so what's the difference this time? First, most of it didn't sound actually 'digital' and colder to me - note that he still (or again?) uses lots of his old analog gear for recording and even live performances, so in the basic sound layers I don't see much of a difference, except that the new recording equipment may have added some definition and brilliance. What DOES make the sound colder are actually new layers added for the re-recording, as e.g. in Oxygene 2, which admittedly sounds a little strange, compared to earlier versions. OTOH, there are pieces like 'Souvenir of China', which have been changed only very little, if at all, and then Chronology 6, which, by adding that 'tinkling-bells' part, has become almost a completely new, and IMHO quite interesting, piece. The 5.1 mix per se mostly comes out quite well, IMO, although some parts, like some in Mike's TB2003, suffer from what I'd call the 'look Ma, 5 channels, and a pan-STICK!'-effect - panning for pannings sake, everything just buzzing around you, like e.g. the children's chorus in the 'Souvenir' intro, that keeps spinning around you.
Well, time to go sleeping now, but I'm wondering about that AERO game announced in the sleeve notes..
|