amazarak
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4ae5/d4ae509d3ad0c9f7b0c214bdfe86e5cad72e531e" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16082/160821596f49899bc8d9ac8f5fb074bebbe7a3a5" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 284
Joined: Mar. 2005 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1897d/1897d804cfe2377c6f46ebb7159528afeeb3075c" alt="" |
Posted: July 22 2007, 15:33 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98658/98658e8c85f685c117baaf74977abb4420795c6c" alt="" |
Please don't get me wrong, because I really appreciate the effort you've made. It's great that still there are people who are willing to do some great work (I know, because currently I'm authoring a dvd of another artist ) and then share it with others.
But please explain me what's the point of capturing in XViD while going to create a DVD? All I can see are disadvantages: 1) XViD is lossy 2) XViD requires far more CPU Power for encoding, what for 99% will result in dropping frames 3) Encoding->Decoding->Encoding means more and more quality loss.
I can think about only one advantage, which is required disk space, but as you also author the DVD, you must have plenty of it...
Summarizing, I don't get the point of your "processing chain" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9924/f99247017a1370cde32ad7a77c77823d098a662c" alt=";)"
cheers
-------------- Just hold your heading true Got to get your finest out
|