Ugo
Group: Members
Posts: 5495
Joined: April 2000 |
|
Posted: Mar. 14 2009, 20:08 |
|
@ Dirk: well, yes, there are various meanings that may be given to the word "duet", but I always tend to stick to the original one, which is the same as in the duetto of Italian opera, i.e. two people singing with each other, not necessarily to each other. Of course it doesn't have to be strictly vocal - especially for a musician, it may very well be an instrumental duet. But when a piece of music is performed by two people on two different instruments, in my own mind it's not as much a duet as a collaboration. So I guess we shouldn't take any of the musical terms that are used here in its strictest meaning.
What do you mean "re-recorded" ? As far as I know, Mike never did a re-recording of Voyager (although IMHO it would be cool if he did! ) or of TSoDE or of MB. Maybe you meant just "recorded" ?
About Alan Parsons, I'm not convinced. Parsons, apart from being even a worse loner, I-do-it-all-by-myself guy, than Mike (i.e. he only works with his own people and with almost no one else... I've never heard a guitar solo on a Parsons-produced record which wasn't played by Ian Bairnson! ), he's a musician, and quite a powerful one. To have him collaborating with Mike would result, IMHO, in a tremendous ego clash which, obviously, would lead to no good. Karl Jenkins is a musician as well, sure, but his classical style worked well within MotS mainly because it didn't clash at all with what Mike wanted to do, with what he aimed to. If Mike does really need a producer, then it should be a producer-producer... a guy who is a producer and nothing else. Someone like Rick Rubin. Or maybe, if he wants to actualize himself a bit more, Timbaland.
-------------- Ugo C. - a devoted Amarokian
|