Ugo
Group: Members
Posts: 5495
Joined: April 2000 |
|
Posted: Feb. 09 2003, 14:58 |
|
Seems like I've been misunderstood a bit, so I'll (try to) restate my point more clearly...
When I buy a soundtrack CD, I buy because I like it as an ALBUM, not because I like the way in which the music on that CD works in the movie. This is not a special criterion I have for judging soundtrack CDs. It's the criterion with which I judge ALL of the CDs I buy. All of the following are beautiful soundtrack ALBUMS to me: The Fugitive, The Piano, Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Schindler's List, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Silence of the Lambs, Blade Runner, The Gladiator, A Clockwork Orange and Ocean's Eleven. All of these are mainly instrumental, i.e. movie scores, because I generally tend not to like soundtrack CDs which are just compilations of songs [Ocean's Eleven got a few songs in it, but I don't think they are important. ]. Unfortunately, The Killing Fields as an ALBUM, to me, just doesn't fit in the above list. I find it boring, a bit depressing and, in some tracks made only of sound effects [e.g. David Bedford's The Year Zero], even musically meaningless. The only reasons why I bought it are: 1) It's a Mike Oldfield album, and I needed it to complete my MO collection ; 2) It contains the full version of Étude, which is unavailable anywhere else.
-------------- Ugo C. - a devoted Amarokian
|