olracUK
Group: Members
Posts: 1683
Joined: June 2003 |
|
Posted: April 06 2014, 20:36 |
|
So, in the car today I played Mike's 2 "rockiest" albums back to back - both have all vocal tracks, a pop or rock feel separated by nearly 30+ years.
Which is better? It's a very subjective question (especially if you're a "classic" fan, or an "ibiza flavour" fan) - but can we add some subjective thoughts to the comparison?
For EM the variation of vocal duties adds to the subtlety, and pleases my ears more. The lyrics are slightly above theasurus/rhyming dictionary level. Production is good, band OK to excellent.
For MotR lyrics are more meaningful, but just one (screaming/screeching) vocalist means there is a lack of variety and interest. Also, the demo's show that on certain ballads Mike does better himself. And the old ryhming dictionary has come out again but with much less success.
The major plus point on this album is the guitar solo's - blows EM out of teh water. Just a shame Lipson and the mastering team have taken some superb studio guys and turned everything up to 11 - and blurred the sound in the volume.
Having said all that, EM took a good few years to earn repeat plays in my car, but MotR has got there much faster.
What do you think?
-------------- The answer is 42 - but what is the question?
|