Silver Negus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4ae5/d4ae509d3ad0c9f7b0c214bdfe86e5cad72e531e" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bc0/77bc01cc2931d1f03f7f844aaeb6c147e2cc1336" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 357
Joined: Sep. 2007 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91ac3/91ac3ea836a7ee3ffe299711cc0f0d9121801975" alt="" |
Posted: Aug. 24 2009, 17:38 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98658/98658e8c85f685c117baaf74977abb4420795c6c" alt="" |
Quote (Ugo @ Aug. 24 2009, 16:21) | I'm not sure whether it can be termed "rock" (@ Sir M.: Are Stereolab rock? ), but my favourite rock song is also my favourite song ever: "Heaven" by Bryan Adams. Mike O.'s "Islands" is a very close second.
@ Silver Negus: Pink Floyd did lots and lots and lots and lots of better stuff than "Take it Back". I'd like to know what is it that makes what is IMHO just a fluffy, poppy piece of vaguely ecologist nonsense, sound "just perfecto" to your ears, because to me the lyrics, the music and the performance are very, very, very inferior to PF's previous output. |
wow you're a fiesty one arent you! Everyone has different tastes and catogorises them differently. To me 'Take it back' displays a moral message, and I tend to like music that has a story to it. To me it' s perfecto for that reason.
I dont tend to listen to music and have an opinion in very black and white terms about it. I'm not really logical about its technical merits all of the time.
|