HRFanUSA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4ae5/d4ae509d3ad0c9f7b0c214bdfe86e5cad72e531e" alt="Offline"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c509/4c5090fd5033807e104687139e3267ff9c93f57b" alt=""
Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: May 2009 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1897d/1897d804cfe2377c6f46ebb7159528afeeb3075c" alt="" |
Posted: July 15 2009, 07:52 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98658/98658e8c85f685c117baaf74977abb4420795c6c" alt="" |
I agree with Dirk on this subject. Cover versions, IMHO, are often other artists paying tribute to the original artist, and as Dirk said, they may reach a new group of fans. I've heard several cover versions of songs and then ended up purchasing the original versions - thus becoming interested in some artists I never knew existed. Case in point, William Orbit's "Adagio For Strings." After hearing this beautiful rendition, I immediately purchased his "Pieces In a Modern Style" CD and discovered several incredible songs I'd never heard before, thus expanding my musical interests.
I like the Moonlight Shadow cover version mentioned in this thread a lot, although the artwork does make it look like an official Mike Oldfield release (very misleading!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9924/f99247017a1370cde32ad7a77c77823d098a662c" alt=";)"
Cover versions are compliments to the orginal artists, IMHO, not that all are complimentary, some are horrible, yet, if they bring a new fan "to the flock," I don't see any harm done...
|