Happy?
![Offline](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/images/mem_offline.gif)
![](http://i.imgur.com/q7lMqMH.jpg)
Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: April 2022 |
![](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/PostIcons/icon0.gif) |
Posted: April 07 2022, 05:06 |
![](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/images/pb_quote.gif) |
The longer I listen to RTO and read about it, the more I recognize the references to his other Great Instrumental Albums besides the rather obvious Ommadawn to which the title and vocals already refer.
The whistle intro refers to Hergest Ridge part 1. Mike himself stated in an interview (can't find it back) that this is indeed a reference to HR. And before I saw the section index of RTO, I already heared the reference to Amarok in the section that I later found out was called 'NotHappy'. A funny nod to the fact that Amarok was originally intended to be the follow up to Ommadawn.
But in Hergest Ridge, as well as Ommadawn and Amarok there is one unique instrument that is completely missing in Return to Ommadawn: the tubular bells! Nothing of them was heard again in this album. I think there really are sections, climaxes, where their sound would fit in perfectly, like the end of the On Horseback jig. Or perhaps an additional bell section to Victory. It's main melody is perfectly playable on tubular bells I guess.
Although I miss the sound of the tu-bu-lar bells in RTO, the album is outstanding even without them! It is a worthy wrap-up of, and conclusion to Hergest Ridge, Ommadawn and Amarok. It truly deserves to be packed in a new Boxed kind of edition, with all of these four albums in 5.1 mixes.
-------------- I'd rather be... happy?
|