SoimSandheaver
Group: Members
Posts: 325
Joined: May 2006 |
|
Posted: May 11 2007, 18:33 |
|
I personally think that every artist has an individuality which no-one else can replace. This is probably why I've never been a fan of Covers, because some Cover Tracks can be truly awful (there are exceptions, some of the Covers I've found here at tubular.net have ben very enjoyable). When it comes to the greats such as Freddie Mercury, John Lennon or Syd Barrett to name just a few, no-one can replace them, because they are simply incomparable.
Mike Oldfield is definitely one of the most flexible artists I've heard, and he's never been afraid to try something different, and I admire him for this. He has also been mostly successful in his experimentations, and now he's going into Orchestral music, because it is one of the types of music he's never really tried before. I'm looking forward to it, because it will be something different. Sometimes, it doesn't really work (some tracks on Light + Shade and Earth Moving seem to garner a lot of negative feedback from what I've seen), but at least he's given it a try.
I can't think of any other artist who has been quite as flexible and/or daring with his music, except for The Beatles (see Sgt. Pepper and The White Album) and Pink Floyd (see Dark Side of the Moon).
Mike Oldfield is one of the hugely under-rated greats of our time, and he, like many other artists, can't be replaced by anyone.
Each to his own.
-------------- "Three blokes go into a pub, one of them's a little bit stupid, then the whole scene unfolds, with a tedious inevitability."
|