Korgscrew
![Offline](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/images/mem_offline.gif)
![](http://journeytoberlin.com/pictures/JJ.jpg)
Group: Super Admins
Posts: 3511
Joined: Dec. 1999 |
![](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/PostIcons/icon0.gif) |
Posted: June 07 2002, 14:32 |
![](/forums/non-cgi/Skin/SKIN-3/images/pb_quote.gif) |
I actually feel that Tres Lunas has quite a nice warm sound already.
The sound depends on the playback equipment partly...an expensive turntable may give you a fuller sound than a cheap CD player, or indeed computer soundcard (though with the way improvements in digital electronics come on in leaps and bounds, even inexpensive equipment can give surprisingly good reproduction).
But as morten just hinted at, there's a bit more to it... There's something more psychological to it - something about a large vinyl disc seems somehow more friendly...and there are the big covers (which, if you're feeling disrespectful towards the album, you can wear on your head while you listen to it...).
Now...which is better to listen to? I suppose that, again, we take a delve into the workings of the mind... It seems that the distortions and compression introduced by analogue equipment (both in processing and reproduction) are, in small amounts, pleasing to the ears of most people. It's these distortions and the way they introduce extra harmonics that would seem to contribute to analogue's 'larger than life' feel. A bass sound that's more harmonically rich tends to seem 'fatter' to people than one that's pure. It goes on from there...I'm straying even further off topic with this ![wink](http://tubular.net/forums/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif)
Mike tried mastering The Songs of Distant Earth to both a 24 bit digital machine and to 1/2" analogue with Dolby SR...he said that he did feel that the analogue master had a warmer sound to it, but that it lacked the clarity of the digital one.
I haven't compared the TB Vinyl to the remaster, but I have with Hergest Ridge. My feel at the time was that the CD remaster was quite unarguably clearer and better defined in its sound quality. Deciding which was nicer was a bit harder - there was something about the fuzzy, warm quality of the vinyl that I thought suited the album rather well, while the remaster seemed a bit too pristine. But I've grown used to the remaster and I think I now prefer it for all its extra clarity.
Warner haven't released any of Mike's albums on vinyl since TSODE. There have been a few club remixes released on vinyl since then, but nothing more. I believe that Vestax were making a disc cutter fairly recently, which you could use to make your own LP (all for about £6000)...
|